Case Study Stakeholders and ParticipantsLots of people were affected by the break-in at Mildred's house, and in RJ City they are given choices about participating in its resolution. Others became involved in helping the parties in the aftermath of the crime. Who Were Harmed?Think about the people who were harmed by Ed and David's actions. MildredMildred, whose house was broken into, was the direct victim. It was her house that was damaged, her possessions stolen and damaged, her life and sense of safety upset. BettyBetty is Mildred's daughter. She experienced first-hand the frightening discovery of the break-in and became responsible for taking care of her mother in the immediate aftermath and in the longer run. Betty's Husband and the ChildrenBetty is married to John and has two children. They were vicariously harmed as they cared for Mildred and Betty, and as they adjusted to the increased demands on Betty in the aftermath of the crime. BarbaraBarbara represents the Mildred's neighbours, who have been feeling increasingly worried about their sense that crime is increasing in their community. There is sufficient concern that Barbara has organized a neighbourhood meeting with the police to talk about what to do. AkliluAklilu is Barbara's young son who worries about whether "the bad people are going to come to their house and take his toys." David's ParentsWhile we don't immediately think of friends and family members of the offenders as indirect victims, their lives are disrupted by their loved one's choices as well. They can experience shame, distancing and even hostility from friends and neighbours, costs related to the legal defense of their loved one, the disruption of attending court hearings, and so forth. Ed's GirlfriendWe don't meet Ed's girlfriend, but we know that he is living with her and can certainly imagine that she has faced some of the difficulties that David's parents have. David and EdThis may initially seem counter-intuitive. How do offenders harm themselves? First, they take on themselves an obligation to make things right, one that the government will hold them to if no one else does. Second, there are moral and ethical consequences to their decision to break in to Mildred's home. Third, they burden themselves with facing the legal, financial and relational consequences of their actions; they need to deal with all the other people they have harmed. Who Participated in the Response? |
LEARN MOREJoin the DiscussionInteract with people who are interested in how the future of justice develops. Collaborative blogs and discussions for beginners and justice professionals. Click here. |
Copyright 2007-2008 Prison Fellowship International -
Reprint Policy